|
My partner and I own a house as tenants-in-common. Adjoining the house is a piece of land, approximately 6.5 acres, which is held in my sole name. We use the land as a paddock for grazing horses.
It occurs to me that when the land is eventually sold, the profit will attract Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and since paddock-sized pieces of land in this area have almost trebled in price since I bought it, the tax could be quite substantial. Conversely, when we sell the house, CGT will not be payable because it is our main residence.
I assume that if the house and land were held as one property, CGT would not be payable because the whole parcel would be a "main residence".
If this assumption is correct, is it legally possible for me to sell the land to us, bringing house and land together under one deed and would such a move enable us to avoid CGT when the house with paddock is sold at some time in the future? If not, can you suggest any other way of achieving a similar objective? I have in mind making the "me to us" sale at an agricultural land price which would produce very little in the way of immediate profit to me.
Maggie Fleming writes:
This is one of the most contentious areas in CGT. There are a number of hurdles for you to negotiate. The first requirement is that the land in question should be "garden or grounds". It is not garden but should qualify as grounds - I assume that you are not letting it out to someone else but are grazing your own horses there.
But the real stumbling block is the "permitted area". An area of up to half a hectare is permitted automatically, but any claim for a larger exempt area will be allowed only if it is, to quote the relevant section of the legislation, "required for the reasonable enjoyment of the dwelling house... having regard to the size and character of the dwelling house".
"Required" is a weasel word but it is clear that the test is what the house requires, not what you require. You are well over the half hectare limit and without knowing the type of house you have - a small property or a mansion house - it is impossible to say what size of grounds are required for its enjoyment. If you bought the house from someone who accepted a much smaller permitted area, you have a weak case, as the Revenue will argue that a larger area cannot be required. If you have made substantial changes to the property, however, including possibly adding stables, you may be able to argue that the paddock is required.
|